[Geek44]

I guess that depends on the modeller Tom. Some folks are happy to build Sherman after Sherman, Tiger after Tiger. Some bash out dozens of kits in a year, some only a few...or even only one. Personally, I find myself most attracted to two kinds of models. The first is of something 'everyday' like a Tiger or a Spitfire but done so well, or differently, or placed in a clever diorama that I can't fail to notice it. I really admire originality among modellers. The other thing that inspires me is something unusual....like your 'Grasshopper'. I've never seen this vehicle before. While I probably wouldn't build it myself...I can see why you are.
I love to see what people do instead of chasing money, playing Playstation, getting drunk...the usual crap people fill their lives with. The very idea that somebody spent time making something with their hands is worthy of respect because they are putting a tiny piece of themselves into it. That inspires me, impresses me and gives me hope when I sometimes lose sight of the depth people are capable of. Whatever the results of our endeavours here, it's the process that is important.
I can see Mr Tamiya's point, but it would seem a little old fashioned. Dragon are tearing him a new one in the market place and his conservatism may prove to be damaging to him. There's no doubting Tamiya's quality...their aircraft are beautiful. But again, he has three versions of the Bristol Beaufighter, each with minor (read cheap to make) variations. Dragon on the other hand have some weird stuff such as the Bachem Natter (Google it if you don't know...it'll surprise you) to name one. I like the weird stuff, but others may not. It seems that Tamiya are no longer the kit of choice for the more experienced builder...unless I have no choice as far as subject matter is concerned, I'll pick a Dragon kit every time over the equivalent Tamiya vehicle. Speaking aircraft, same statement, manufacturers reversed.