World War II Zone Forums

Go Back   World War II Zone Forums > Europe, Africa, and the Middle East > Africa and the Middle East
Portal Chat Register Members Awards Videos Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Notices

Africa and the Middle East The site of the first Allied victories

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11 (permalink)  
Old July 13th, 2006, 05:10 AM
Hobilar's Avatar
Sergeant



 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lincoln, United Kingdom
Age: 60
Posts: 145
Re: Who was better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Klaus View Post

@ Hobilar: being out of touch with your Highcommand doesn't have to be a bad thing. During "Fall gelb" (the invasion of france) Rommel advanced so quick, that even the Highcommand somtimes didn't know were they were. Thus earning them the name "Geister Division" ("ghost division").

Fine-You might be able to get away with such things as a Divisional Commander, but as an Army Group Commander then a bit more responsibility might well be in order.
__________________
"They say hard work never hurt anybody, but I figured why take the chance"....Ronald Reagan
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #12 (permalink)  
Old July 13th, 2006, 05:25 AM
Klaus's Avatar
Super Moderator



 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Austria
Age: 27
Posts: 984
Awards Showcase
Austria 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Who was better?

Hm, you are propably right about that.
__________________
"Wenn das so weiter geht, dann können wir von der Westfront and die Ostfront mit der Straßenbahn fahren"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old July 14th, 2006, 05:41 AM
Hobilar's Avatar
Sergeant



 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lincoln, United Kingdom
Age: 60
Posts: 145
Re: Who was better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 515 View Post
Montgomery masterminded Operation Market Garden, which was a complete failure.

If punching a 60 mile salient through the German defences and coming close to creating a bridgehead across the Rhine (thus outflanking the Siegfried Line) is a 'complete failure', then I would hate to think what you would consider an 'outstanding success'. Eisenhower. at the time, was extremely pleased with what 21st Army group had achieved, and fill of praise for the brave airborne formations.

OK, so the operation didn't achieve all that ot was meant to do, but this was mainly as a result of bad weather and communications failures. No battle ever goes according to plan (most battle plans rarely survive the first hour of combat). Montgomery, ever the professional soldier, would have taken this into account and (in my opinion) if any criticism of his plan should be made, then it should be that of delaying to implement a 'Plan B' as soon as it became clear that 1st Airborne had encountered serious trouble.
__________________
"They say hard work never hurt anybody, but I figured why take the chance"....Ronald Reagan
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old July 14th, 2006, 06:05 AM
Klaus's Avatar
Super Moderator



 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Austria
Age: 27
Posts: 984
Awards Showcase
Austria 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Who was better?

I'm with Hobilar on this one. Saying "Market garden" was a complete faliure would be harsh. If not unfair to Montgomery.

But due to a lack of coordination between SHAEF, the 21. Army and the 1. Allied air landing army they were not prepared for such a battle. The allies thought that they will only encounter Hitler Youth and Volksturm as opponents in Arnheim, since regular German units had left. They didn't know that the 2. SS Panzerkorps under SS Obergruppenfuehrer William Bittrich was still in this area. The corps was far from its desired strength, but was however far superior to the relatively easily equipped British and Polish paratroopers. Although the Netherlands resistance movement passed on Photos of the returning tanks to the Allied command, these Photos were not considered in the following phase.






"It is good to have a plan, but you should be prepared to improvise."
__________________
"Wenn das so weiter geht, dann können wir von der Westfront and die Ostfront mit der Straßenbahn fahren"

Last edited by Klaus; July 14th, 2006 at 06:11 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old July 14th, 2006, 12:43 PM
Sarge's Avatar
Private First Class



 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 49
Re: Who was better?

Its always interested me that Monty was apparently slated for his Normandy campaign. The basic premise was that the British sat brewing tea while the US got on with the battle.

In reality Monty achieved all that he set out to do in Normandy. His plan was for a 90 day battle and it went roughly according to the plan. Sure, some of his ststements regarding Caen in particular did him no good, but he was the overall Commander of all Allied forces until the breakout when Ike took overall command.

There was a huge political campaign against him by both US and British commanders which he did himself no favours by various political statements of his own.

However his plan always was to hold the main German strength tight up against the British sector while allowing the US front to build up enough strength to break out.

I think history has been a little unkind to Monty who was not in my opinion a particularly likeable person, but that shouldn't take anything away from his achievements.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old July 14th, 2006, 01:21 PM
Jim O's Avatar
Administrator



 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,582
Awards Showcase
Founder United States 
Total Awards: 2
Re: Who was better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarge View Post
...There was a huge political campaign against him by both US and British commanders which he did himself no favours by various political statements of his own...I think history has been a little unkind to Monty who was not in my opinion a particularly likeable person, but that shouldn't take anything away from his achievements.
These are undeniable truths. I agree that he was better than he is remembered as, but perhaps also not as good as he thought of himself.
__________________
You must be the change you wish to see in the world.

Mohandas K Gandhi
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old July 15th, 2006, 12:53 AM
515's Avatar
515 515 is offline
Corporal



 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 55
Re: Who was better?

True. Saying complete failure is a bit harsh. I didnt mean it to be that harsh. But remeber that the British 6th airborn lost 8,000 men. Or the other way around lol. 8th airborn, 6,000 men. One of those. They did achieve ground. I probably should have thought it through a bit before i posted.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old July 15th, 2006, 04:17 AM
Hobilar's Avatar
Sergeant



 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lincoln, United Kingdom
Age: 60
Posts: 145
Re: Who was better?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarge View Post

I think history has been a little unkind to Monty who was not in my opinion a particularly likeable person, but that shouldn't take anything away from his achievements.
Lets face it-You don't get to become a Field Marshal by winning a popularity contest. You get to be a Field Marshal by being a bigger B****** than every one else.

I don't suppose Montgomery ever gave a moments thought to whether he was liked by Politicians, other Generals, or even the men under his command.

With the lives of a million men in his hands (plus the responsibility for the fate of the millions of citizens at home should he fail) many a man would not have been able to sleep at night.
__________________
"They say hard work never hurt anybody, but I figured why take the chance"....Ronald Reagan
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old July 17th, 2006, 05:40 AM
Klaus's Avatar
Super Moderator



 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Austria
Age: 27
Posts: 984
Awards Showcase
Austria 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Who was better?

You certainly don't get made Fieldmarshall for cooking the finest tes in the Army. Thats for sure.
__________________
"Wenn das so weiter geht, dann können wir von der Westfront and die Ostfront mit der Straßenbahn fahren"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old September 21st, 2006, 06:19 PM
515's Avatar
515 515 is offline
Corporal



 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 55
Re: Who was better?

i too have heard that Rommel was captured and escaped. Im pretty sure that its true. Dont know know. dont hold it to me
__________________
R.I.P Steve Irwin 1962--2006
"Crikey!"

Gamma Productions: Sound, Lighting and Production
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





If you enjoy this site and wish to help defray web hosting and software expenses, please consider becoming a

Site Supporter

World War II Topsites

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
All content ©2006-2008 World War II Zone. All rights reserved.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91
Page generated in 0.33419 seconds with 23 queries