![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| American Civil War Anything and anyone Civil War, including the events leading up to it and its aftermath. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| Sponsored Links |
|
||||
|
Re: Civil War Q&A
It's an endlessly debated question, but from what I've been able to tell, "Pickett's Charge" at the time was considered less dramatic than the fight at Culps Hill. When tourists came to G-burg, they flocked to Culps Hill and practically ignored the area of Pickett's Charge.
While the casualties were heavy, they weren't, as some people believed, astronomical for the time. Yes, several regiments were practically destroyed on paper, but throughout the night and into the next day, (during the retreat), many rejoined their units and brought them back up to strength. While Pickett did blame Lee for "the charge", and the fault is ultimately his, the attack was poorly coordinated with other elements to begin with. Longstreet, whose overall command this was, really should get more of the blame (and has in recent years). The Southern people as a whole, for a good while, actually saw Gettysburg as a victory, according to the press at the time, and it wasn't "propaganda". While Lee did see it as a defeat, the long term strategic goals, were met, as the 2nd Invasion drew Union troops out of Virginia, brought the war home to civilians, and bought more time for the Davis gov't, likely at least another year or more. |
|
|||||
|
Re: Civil War Q&A
I agree with Jason on most of his post. Culp's Hill probably got more visitors because it was a large Confederate force assaulting a smaller, and thinner Union line. It may have amazed them that a line that thin, I think at one point it was less than a one rank line, was able to hold off multiple Confederate attacks (albeit they were up hill and against wooden palisades of sorts) where as they may have just seen Pickett's Charge as another assault by one side against another side that was using the environment to their advantage. They only thing that may have caught them off guard could have been the scale of the casualties (Pickett 67%, Pettigrew 60%, Trimble 52%) but then againt it may not have coming just shy of six months after Fredericksburg which had a similar assault times three or four by the Union army instead of the confederate.
Although the North Carolinian's made it the furthest and suffered high casualties they may have been more in shock that two of their rising stars had been killed in the Battle (Burgwyn-Killed on the 1st, and Pettigrew- killed in the rear guard action yards from the "border"). They may have wanted to put these memories out of their heads so instead of dwelling on this they talked out Culp's Hill and the Round Tops. Just my $0.02, Matt NC - "First at Bethel, Furthest at Gettysburg, Last at Appomattox"
__________________
"We Will Stay Here, If We Must All Go to Hell Together" -Col. John R. Cooke, 27th NC, Hatcher's Run, 2 April 1865Avatar: My Grandfather on the right. His twin on the left. Their older brother in the middle. In their Navy Blues |
|
|||||
|
Re: Civil War Q&A
G'day guys. (
).I don't know a heck of a lot about the ACW as you can imagine, other than what I've gleaned from US made TV of which we get a lot. I suppose I think the war was about slavery but I get the vibe that it's much more complicated than that. I don't know how long it lasted exactly or when it started...I think it was the 1870s but that's a fifty fifty stab in the dark from me. I'm also pretty sure Lincoln was Prez. Without wishing to open too big a can of worms for you guys, can anyone please give me a brief outline? Remember...'Civil War For Dummies' here. It's my understanding that the Springfield Rifle was innovated during this war which I believe was the first rifle one could aim rather than just point because it wasn't firing balls and that it was the first 'mass produced' weapon too. Thanks. Peace.
__________________
'It's a long way there. It's a long way to where I'm going.' - LRB. |
|
|||||
|
Re: Civil War Q&A
Quote:
I try and keep it as simple as possible. For the debate on the reasons of the war see the thread "Was the Civil War Really About Slavery?" below this one. Anyway tensions were high in 1860 when Lincoln was elected to office and some in the south spread "propaganda" (best word I can think to call it) that Lincoln would abolish slavery and what not which scared the South because as you may know it was the major economic activity and with it went many of the other economic goodies (tobacco, cotton, etc). In reality he only wanted to stop the expansion of it but this still would be bad for the south because the number of slave and free states would become unequal (I think it was somewhere around 18 each side when war broke out). Then they would have lesser say in Congress and the Senate if (more like when) the expulsion of slavery was brought up. On the same level the north were already feared that the Gov't was going to hell in a hand basket and being run by pro-slavery south. This made every one uneasy both north and south. South Carolina acted first and on 24 December 1860 it seceded under the premises that it wanted to protect the state rights of South slave states (basically it wanted to prevent itself from losing slavery which they feared would come soon). Mississippi, Florida, and Alabama followed on 9, 10 and ,11 Jan 61 respectively. On the 19th Georgia seceded, Louisiana on the 26th, and Texas on 1 February. This happened all before Lincoln had even taken office in the beginning of March. On 4 February they met in Montgomery, Alabama and formed the CSA with former Secretary of War Jefferson Davis as their President. All things were going nicely until 12 April 1861 when Southern forces under PGT Beaureguard shelled Fort Sumter, with Davis and Sec of War Stanton's approval, as it was being supplied. The garrison surrendered the next day without any casualties (until one of the "honor guns" misfired killing a union soldier) and was paroled soon after. This sparked Lincoln's anger and he sent out the call for 75,000 90 day volunteers. The four "border states" refused to send troops against their fellow southern states and Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina seceded from the Union. Missouri and Kentucky, although never seceding from the Union still got stars on the Confederate flag. To be continued... Any one want to take the torch or should I continue?
__________________
"We Will Stay Here, If We Must All Go to Hell Together" -Col. John R. Cooke, 27th NC, Hatcher's Run, 2 April 1865Avatar: My Grandfather on the right. His twin on the left. Their older brother in the middle. In their Navy Blues |
|
|||||
|
Re: Civil War Q&A
Okay it looks like I will continue....by posting clips from wiki and explaining them a little
First up the Anaconda Plan: This was the North's strategy of blockading the south, cutting it in half by the Mississippi River and constricting its economy thus the name anaconda. Details: Quote:
I don't think I can explain it any more than what wiki says but the Eastern theater was really just from the Appalachians (Western North Carolina and Virginia) to the coast: Quote:
The "West" was really everything west of the Appalachians to the Mississippi River not the actual west. Quote:
__________________
"We Will Stay Here, If We Must All Go to Hell Together" -Col. John R. Cooke, 27th NC, Hatcher's Run, 2 April 1865Avatar: My Grandfather on the right. His twin on the left. Their older brother in the middle. In their Navy Blues |
|
|||||
|
Re: Civil War Q&A
Trans-Mississippi Theater was the regions directly west of the Mississippi where fighting in Missouri and Arkansas eventually seized that area for the north.
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"We Will Stay Here, If We Must All Go to Hell Together" -Col. John R. Cooke, 27th NC, Hatcher's Run, 2 April 1865Avatar: My Grandfather on the right. His twin on the left. Their older brother in the middle. In their Navy Blues |
|
|||||
|
Re: Civil War Q&A
Nick I hope that helps here are some wikipedia links with further details:
Naval Battles Union Blockade Eastern Theater Western Theater Trans-Mississippi Theater
__________________
"We Will Stay Here, If We Must All Go to Hell Together" -Col. John R. Cooke, 27th NC, Hatcher's Run, 2 April 1865Avatar: My Grandfather on the right. His twin on the left. Their older brother in the middle. In their Navy Blues |
|
|||||
|
Re: Civil War Q&A
Thanks for your time with this Matt, I appreciate the effort you've gone to to answer my (very broad) question. There's plenty to digest here and as I suspected, things were far more complicated than I've known.
American history is something one needs to 'specialize' in at tertiary institutions...sadly, at the time I was at school, all high school history was Australian. Further, without viewing American history as 'trivial' by any means, your average Aussie has little use for it other than what he learns from TV and movies which of course offer a more 'theatrical' version of events rather than being accurate representations. I'm sure the converse is true also...I'm certain there are members here who think of Crocodile Dundee when they think of Australia. Luckily, Crocodile Dundee is a pretty good indication of how we all live down here...and how we dress ![]() Interesting conflict for me in some ways. My main interest in military things stems directly from my modelling and the ACW doesn't offer much in that respect but the ironclads have me fascinated. Thanks again mate...I've learned plenty. Peace.
__________________
'It's a long way there. It's a long way to where I'm going.' - LRB. |
|
|||||
|
Re: Civil War Q&A
Quote:
I wonder if anyone has an opinion on Grand Strategy -- i.e. strategy on a national scale (that which Lincoln & Davis were responsible for) For instance, could the USA have ended the war sooner and/or with less casualties by concentrating on the East or West? Or used more amphib invasions? Is there anything the CSA could have done differently to win the war?
__________________
Are you ready for some ultimate?!?!!!
|