RAF Liberators said:
I also doubt that it was a military weapon, I base this purely on the level of craftmanship and detailing. In my experience in older guns (which is very limited) standard issue equipment was pretty plain, guns that were privately owned and in military use were expensive so if this was a military gun then it would probably of been owned by someone with money.
I would say that this was a hunting weapon.
Are there no other discernable markings?
So far this is all i have.
The guns weight is 9 lbs.
Its lenght is 112 inches.
Barrel diameter at the mussel is 2 inches.
And i'm almost certain the stock and for stock are made of curly maple..a very hard wood.
Not sure if curly maple is found in the U.S.
There are no other stamps or numbers,just engravings..very worn..
On the side is it looks to be a english setter jumping after fowl,and looking down at the fish head hammers theres a very small engravment of a ruffed growse or pheasent.
With the english setter and the maple type i think this gun was posably made in great britan.Maybe in the late 1800's
I have looked very hard with a maginfine glass for any #"s but no luck.
The strange thing is my father was not a hunter and when i would go hunting with a friend "White tails" he would just shake his head.His brother was a hunter like me,but what is an 1800's mussel loading shot gun doing in my attic.
Thats the mystery to me.