World War II Zone Forums: Something about <Band of Brothers> - World War II Zone Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Something about <Band of Brothers> Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   jj2jr 

  • Staff Sergeant
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 282
  • Joined: April-22 09

Posted May 22, 2009 - 12:14 AM

I think we all know what <Band of Brothers> is, right?

I've seen this TV series for several time, and I think some of the scenes were odd to me. For instance, in the 2nd episode "Day of Days" when Winters dropped to earth and met Hall of the other company, they scrolled in the woods and hid away from the German ground forces. When they went pass a firing German 2cm Flakvierling post and they stop. Then Winters said that they had to wait and quit when the German stopped for reload.

I feel odd for Winters' decision. Was it a better time and more easier for their running when the Germans concentrated in shooting and the loud firing sound can also cover their existing. And why would Winters has to choose to move in a quieter time?

This is one of my question about the production of this great TV series.

Attached File(s)

  • Attached File  03.jpg (39.83K)
    Number of downloads: 96
  • Attached File  04.jpg (45.41K)
    Number of downloads: 97
  • Attached File  01.jpg (34.29K)
    Number of downloads: 411
  • Attached File  02.jpg (45K)
    Number of downloads: 103


#2 User is offline   Tom Houlihan 

  • Lieutenant General
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 4362
  • Joined: July-01 06

Posted May 22, 2009 - 02:38 AM

The airborne troops had specific missions, that were required to be completed before the amphibious landing came in at dawn. They didn't have time to wait. To the best of their abilities, all those men who dropped into Normandy stepped off to complete their missions.
www.mapsatwar.us
SSGT, USMC (ret)
(looking for interesting info about 6.SS-Nord)

#3 User is offline   TRDG 

  • Lieutenant General
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4874
  • Joined: March-10 08

Posted May 24, 2009 - 04:38 PM

Nice call OT, time sensative mission and what if they were heard anyways and they swung their still loaded AA gun on them as they were moving out...... All in all probably dramitizing the causion and being clear thinking (regardless) in their first face to face after landing with the enemy. I have the book but don't remember if it is in there on the whys though.

Cheers

Tom

#4 User is offline   Aussie Dave 

  • Captain
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 1468
  • Joined: February-10 08

Posted August 01, 2009 - 06:08 PM

IMO the order to wait until the 20mm was reloading would be because the german Flakvierling loaders would be busy then and not just standing there and looking around.

:dancer01: His order makes sense to me.



Cheers,
Dave
Posted Image There's no honorable way to kill, no gentle way to destroy. There is nothing good in war. Except its ending. - Anonymous. Posted Image

#5 User is offline   Airchallenged 

  • Sergeant Major
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 659
  • Joined: April-03 08

Posted August 07, 2009 - 08:22 PM

Dave got the answer right. If the gun was still firing and saw them they could be blown to bits. While loading the gunners are occupied with the task at hand and not paying attention to the noises around them. While firing they can be looking around at what is around them and do some listening. Dave is right.
"We Will Stay Here, If We Must All Go to Hell Together"
-Col. John R. Cooke, 27th NC, Hatcher's Run, 2 April 1865


Avatar: My Grandfather on the right. His twin on the left. Their older brother in the middle. In their Navy Blues

#6 User is offline   Wälser 

  • Private First Class
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 32
  • Joined: May-14 09

Posted August 08, 2009 - 05:17 AM

Wasnt it practise to shoot 2 barrels while reloading the other 2?

#7 User is offline   TRDG 

  • Lieutenant General
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4874
  • Joined: March-10 08

Posted August 09, 2009 - 07:51 AM

Not sure but I would think firing all barrels at an air target for max damage would be priority. Now if it were ground targets getting closer, then maybe 2 barrels fire while the other two are being reloaded. Just to keep the oncoming and "getting closer" ground forces heads down.

Cheers, have you heard this was pretty common Walser?

Tom
"Long is the way, rich and fruitfull the earth. On her fields death held its harvest." War in the East....
SGT Rolf Werner, in those fields, fighting in Russia Sep, 1941. All to true in my humble opinion!!

#8 User is offline   gi-rene 

  • Captain
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 1372
  • Joined: February-18 08

Posted August 09, 2009 - 09:02 AM

Either or:

Quote

The gun was fired by a set of two footpedals—each of which fired two diametrically opposite Flak 38s—and could be operated either automatically or semi-automatically. When raised, the weapon measured 307 cm (10 feet 1 inch) high.

Each of the four mounted guns fired from a 20-round magazine at a maximum combined rate of fire of 1,400 rounds per minute (reduced to 800 rounds per minute for combat use). The guns could be fired in pairs (diagonally opposite) or simultaneously, in either semi-automatic or fully automatic mode. Its effective vertical range was 2200 meters. It was also used just as effectively against ground targets as it was against low-flying aircraft.

Posted Image

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users