World War II Zone Forums: 105mm vs. 75mm Howitzer - World War II Zone Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

105mm vs. 75mm Howitzer Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Whiterook 

  • General of the Army
  • View gallery
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 10589
  • Joined: February-15 08
  • LocationWestern, Massachusetts, USA

Posted July 01, 2009 - 01:08 PM

OK....I need some help (he said, stating the obvious):

I need to know what the difference was between the 105mm vs. 75mm Howitzer artillery pieces were during WWII

I've been doing some searching on the Internet and am coming up short. I am adding miniatures to my 15mm gaming OOB, and I have ordered pieces simply labeled "105mm Howitzer"...no picture, so I don't even know what I ordered, per se. I am assuming it is the 105mm Howitzer M2A1 (M101). What I already have in my collection is several M8 75mm Pack Howitzers which I've found reference to on the web as M1A1, also known as the M116 Howitzer. Confused? I am.

I need some detail on what these guns were, compared to one another.

Which one was more powerful (my guess is the 75mm, from what I've read)?

Did one replace the other in primary use?

Theaters?

And anything else you think may help.

I am trying to determine a COST (in Axis & Allies Miniatures game system terms. For instance: a 37mm Gun M3 costs 5 points and 75mm Pack Howitzer costs 6 points . Where does the 105mm stand?

Now if this weren't asking enough.....I also boiught some 57mm Gun M1!!! Same questions.....

:applause:
"The Golden Rule of War, Speed - Simplicity - Boldness"
"YOU ARE NOT BEATEN UNTIL YOU ADMIT IT. HENCE, DON'T..."
-- General George S. Patton, Jr

#2 User is offline   Tom Houlihan 

  • Lieutenant General
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 4362
  • Joined: July-01 06

Posted July 01, 2009 - 01:34 PM

Quote

I need to know what the difference was between the 105mm vs. 75mm Howitzer artillery pieces were during WWII


Oh, about 30 millimeters...

"The obvious difference is the size of the round, which impacts the amount of explosive and the amount of propellant. These obviously impact the power and range, but you knew that," said General Obvious.

M116 howitzer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
M101 howitzer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It would seem that the biggest difference is size/mobility. That would apparently be the biggest difference, besides the above stated obvious.
www.mapsatwar.us
SSGT, USMC (ret)
(looking for interesting info about 6.SS-Nord)

#3 User is offline   Panzercommander 

  • Captain
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1455
  • Joined: December-29 08

Posted July 01, 2009 - 08:19 PM

The 75mm pack howitzer is a light air portable and is easy to move around , most likely seen with mountain or airborne troops. The 105mm howitzer , is bigger all around and requires more to move and would be seen at a higher level for artillery support.

Though not being a "gunner" size does matter, bigger the better.

2 cents from a ex-tanker.


PC

#4 User is offline   Whiterook 

  • General of the Army
  • View gallery
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 10589
  • Joined: February-15 08
  • LocationWestern, Massachusetts, USA

Posted July 01, 2009 - 08:53 PM

OK....so 105mm is bigger and badder than 75mm???
"The Golden Rule of War, Speed - Simplicity - Boldness"
"YOU ARE NOT BEATEN UNTIL YOU ADMIT IT. HENCE, DON'T..."
-- General George S. Patton, Jr

#5 User is offline   Wustenfuchs 

  • Lieutenant General
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 4430
  • Joined: April-07 08

Posted July 01, 2009 - 10:19 PM

The standard WW2 105mm field howitzer (M101) fired a 14.97 kg high explosive shell at 472 meters per second out to a range of 11,160 meters.

The 75mm pack howitzer (M1) fired a 6.62 kg high explosive shell at 381 meters per second out to a range of 8,790 meters.

The 105 is bigger and much badder.
Believe those who seek the Truth: Doubt those who find it.
Posted Image

#6 User is offline   Frizzenspark 

  • Brigadier General
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 2719
  • Joined: February-22 09

Posted July 01, 2009 - 10:33 PM

Whiterook said:

OK....so 105mm is bigger and badder than 75mm???


Well, by definition 105mm IS bigger than 75mm.

Badder? All depends on your definition... the 75mm is a really small gun and you can sneak them into the tightest spots. much less metal to lug around.

The 105mm is a fairly substantial piece....ouch time for the other side.
"Oh! let us never, never doubt What nobody is sure about!"

Hilaire Belloc

#7 User is offline   MAGNA 

  • Lieutenant General
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 4923
  • Joined: February-26 08

Posted July 02, 2009 - 05:57 AM

Bigger and Badder sounds like a good approximation to me. In gaming terms anything up to and including 105's is even shooting. As you go bigger - 122ish you get a plus, then for 140 to 155 a bigger plus (more pain to throw).

#8 User is offline   Whiterook 

  • General of the Army
  • View gallery
  • Group: Super Moderators
  • Posts: 10589
  • Joined: February-15 08
  • LocationWestern, Massachusetts, USA

Posted July 03, 2009 - 10:56 AM

OK...that helps a lot, thank you mates! Please keep the great info coming, of course, but I think I have enough to work out 'the details'.
"The Golden Rule of War, Speed - Simplicity - Boldness"
"YOU ARE NOT BEATEN UNTIL YOU ADMIT IT. HENCE, DON'T..."
-- General George S. Patton, Jr

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users