World War II Zone Forums

Go Back   World War II Zone Forums > Arsenal - The Fighting Weapons of World War II > Personal Combat Weapons
Portal Register Members Awards Videos Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Notices

Personal Combat Weapons Infantry small arms and light machines guns, pistols, edged weaponry and specialty weapons

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #11 (permalink)  
Old May 18th, 2008, 06:23 PM
Private First Class



 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 32
Re: Worst Small Arms of WWII

The BAR has to be on the list. Low magazine capacity, difficult to keep clean, no interchangable barrel.

It left the American infantry team without a real LMG, it was neither one thing nor the other, trying to be both.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #12 (permalink)  
Old May 19th, 2008, 07:51 PM
Horch's Avatar
Sergeant Major



 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southron
Posts: 652
Re: Worst Small Arms of WWII

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnieB View Post
The BAR has to be on the list. Low magazine capacity, difficult to keep clean, no interchangable barrel.

It left the American infantry team without a real LMG, it was neither one thing nor the other, trying to be both.
Total disagreement there!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old May 19th, 2008, 08:09 PM
McCoy's Avatar
Super Moderator



 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Skellefteć
Age: 38
Posts: 4,175
Awards Showcase
Sweden 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Worst Small Arms of WWII

The B.A.R. wasn't a bad weapon, on the contrary it was a good weapon. But it isn't or didn't aspire to be an LMG 'cos that's not what it was. The B.A.R. is a Squad Support Weapon.
__________________
And if the cloud bursts, thunder in your ear
You shout and no one seems to hear
And if the band you're in starts playing different tunes
I'll see you on the dark side of the moon
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old May 20th, 2008, 09:35 AM
Private First Class



 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 32
Re: Worst Small Arms of WWII

Meaning what? Low rate of sustained fire due to single barrel, when the rest of the world had for example, the MG42 or the Bren.

Doesn't cut it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old May 20th, 2008, 10:23 AM
McCoy's Avatar
Super Moderator



 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Skellefteć
Age: 38
Posts: 4,175
Awards Showcase
Sweden 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Worst Small Arms of WWII

The US had the M1919A6 for the role as a LMG n' the M1919A4 in the role as a MMG. The B.A.R. on the other hand gave the riflesquad more firepower in it's role as a suad support weapon. In fact an American riflesquad had more firepower than an German riflesquad. An American riflesquad often had two B.A.R., eight M1 Garand n' two M1A1 Thompson while an German riflesquad often had ten Kar98 n' two MP40. It's a widespread myth that every German squad packed MG34/42 MG's when they used MG squads n' added internal MG's to crack units riflesquads. The British often had three Bren guns in their riflesquads n' equiped the rest with S.M.L.E.s with some addition och the odd Sten gun.
__________________
And if the cloud bursts, thunder in your ear
You shout and no one seems to hear
And if the band you're in starts playing different tunes
I'll see you on the dark side of the moon
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old May 20th, 2008, 07:15 PM
Tom Houlihan's Avatar
Super Moderator



 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Michigan
Age: 47
Posts: 2,343
Awards Showcase
US Marine Corps Service Award United States 
Total Awards: 2
Re: Worst Small Arms of WWII

You can't confuse the BAR with an MG, that wasn't its purpose. It was supposed to fit the gap between the rifles and the MGs, which it did quite nicely! As fast as the M1 would fire, the BAR fired even faster! It made a nice integral back-up for the riflemen.
__________________
www.mapsatwar.us
SSGT, USMC (ret)
(looking for interesting info about 6.SS-Nord)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old May 20th, 2008, 11:05 PM
panzer228's Avatar
Private First Class



 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 48
Re: Worst Small Arms of WWII

I say the MP40. Im not saying that the MP40 is a worst gun produced in the war, just that it had some problems. Some of these problems were that it had a slow rate of fire and it was expensive to produce. The main cause of malfunction is that the magazine was also frequently misused as a handhold, which could also cause a failure to feed when hand pressure on the magazine body caused the feed lips to move out of position since the magazine well did not keep the magazine firmly locked like on a Sten. The germans had to hold the intended handhold on the underside of the weapon to avoid free malfunctions. Still, the MP40 is a great weapon if you ask me.
__________________
"We did not intend to fight enemy warships...but we took up the fight. The crew have behaved magnificently. we shall win or die."

Admiral Lütjens - Commander of the Bismarck's Naval Squadron - 25th May 1941
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old May 21st, 2008, 03:54 AM
Private First Class



 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 32
Re: Worst Small Arms of WWII

Quote:
Originally Posted by McCoy View Post
It's a widespread myth that every German squad packed MG34/42 MG's when they used MG squads n' added internal MG's to crack units riflesquads.
I'm not sure where you are getting this. As early as the 1937
KStN 131a (R) (2.11.1937)
the basic Gruppe was 7 KAR 09, 1 MG34 and 2 Pistolen

By the 1944
K.St.N.131V (1.11.1944)
the basic Zug was 2 Sturm Gruppen of 7 Stgw 44 0r and a 3rd Gruppe of 5 Stgw 44 & 2 MG42.

That's organic squad fire support with a standard load-out of 1200 rounds of MG ammunition.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old May 21st, 2008, 08:37 AM
lorddeathrage's Avatar
Private First Class



 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 16
Posts: 30
Re: Worst Small Arms of WWII

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnieB View Post
The BAR has to be on the list. Low magazine capacity, difficult to keep clean, no interchangable barrel.

It left the American infantry team without a real LMG, it was neither one thing nor the other, trying to be both.
The BAR is an Automatic Rifle, designed in 1917 it was supposed to be a U.S SSW to see out the Great War. It was used in WW2, but was not the leading SSW for American infantry forces, the Browning M1919A4 was.

I like to think about it this way:

The BAR was to the U.S what the MG42 was to the Germans.

The Browning M1919A4 was to the U.S what the MG34 was to the Germans.

ldr
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old May 21st, 2008, 08:41 AM
lorddeathrage's Avatar
Private First Class



 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 16
Posts: 30
Re: Worst Small Arms of WWII

Quote:
Originally Posted by McCoy View Post
The US had the M1919A6 for the role as a LMG n' the M1919A4 in the role as a MMG. The B.A.R. on the other hand gave the riflesquad more firepower in it's role as a suad support weapon. In fact an American riflesquad had more firepower than an German riflesquad. An American riflesquad often had two B.A.R., eight M1 Garand n' two M1A1 Thompson while an German riflesquad often had ten Kar98 n' two MP40. It's a widespread myth that every German squad packed MG34/42 MG's when they used MG squads n' added internal MG's to crack units riflesquads. The British often had three Bren guns in their riflesquads n' equiped the rest with S.M.L.E.s with some addition och the odd Sten gun.
Damn you McCoy, you stole what I wrote. But you wrote it before me, when I was writing it. Yes, it all makes sence now..
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's the worst World War II movie? Phidippides World War II on Screen 22 June 12th, 2008 05:35 AM
Photo: Female factory worker posed with finished Sten sub-machinegun, Small Arms Plan RSS Bot RSS Feeds 0 June 13th, 2007 11:50 PM
Photo: Americans attacked Japanese snipers in a cave with bazooka and small arms, nor RSS Bot RSS Feeds 0 April 13th, 2007 10:22 PM
Photo: Four US Marines cleared out a cave with BAR, small arms, and grenades, Iwo Jim RSS Bot RSS Feeds 0 January 30th, 2007 09:35 AM
Photo: Three US Marines cleared out a cave with BAR, small arms, and grenades, Iwo Ji RSS Bot RSS Feeds 0 January 30th, 2007 04:34 AM




If you enjoy this site and wish to help defray web hosting and software expenses, please consider becoming a

Site Supporter

World War II Topsites

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content ©2006-2008 World War II Zone. All rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.14420 seconds with 16 queries

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108