Following a potential thread hijacking in the Softball Sign Up joint...here's a new one. A couple of members and I have been discussing the pros and cons of our national football codes. Here's my take...
I had a mate in high school who had spent three years living in Providence, Rhode Island. He attended school there and learned something about the rules of NFL. Years later when we were sharing a house and we'd stay up late on a Thursday night and watch Don Lane present one NFL game. I grew to enjoy the strategic facet of the game but as an Aussie who's grown up with the fluid speed seen in AFL, I found the NFL game kinda stodgy...like day old porridge. Suffice to say I find rugby (both codes) a bit the same.
I must admit that I've forgotten most of the rules and some of the terminology ('First and down!!'). I suspect that with a more mature mind than I had in the 'Hobbsy/NFL' days, I might rekindle an interest.
Having said that...AFL is fast, hard and when played well...to my eyes...beautiful.
Here's one point of the game to accompany the video. If a player kicks the ball further than fifteen metres and a team mate catches it (termed 'a mark') without it touching the ground, the guy who caught the ball has a 'free kick' in which he can pick a target and kick toward it...be that another team mate or a score. He can also 'play on' which means he runs with the ball and is open to tackle...he must either bounce the ball or touch it to the ground every five seconds. A mark is not a score, but an opportunity to more efficiently move the ball toward the goal posts. The lengths to which players will go to achieve a 'mark' are extraordinary. It's a longish video at around five minutes. Those of us who love our 'footy' will watch it all twice.
Hal, I checked out that link...I know it's a tough game. Thanks...learning again.
Peace



Reply With Quote








And who says "White Men Can't Jump?"





Bookmarks