+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Something about <Band of Brothers>

  1. Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    282

    Something about <Band of Brothers>




    I think we all know what <Band of Brothers> is, right?

    I've seen this TV series for several time, and I think some of the scenes were odd to me. For instance, in the 2nd episode "Day of Days" when Winters dropped to earth and met Hall of the other company, they scrolled in the woods and hid away from the German ground forces. When they went pass a firing German 2cm Flakvierling post and they stop. Then Winters said that they had to wait and quit when the German stopped for reload.

    I feel odd for Winters' decision. Was it a better time and more easier for their running when the Germans concentrated in shooting and the loud firing sound can also cover their existing. And why would Winters has to choose to move in a quieter time?

    This is one of my question about the production of this great TV series.
    Attachments        

  2. Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Age
    48
    Posts
    4,252

    Re: Something about <Band of Brothers>

    The airborne troops had specific missions, that were required to be completed before the amphibious landing came in at dawn. They didn't have time to wait. To the best of their abilities, all those men who dropped into Normandy stepped off to complete their missions.
    www.mapsatwar.us
    SSGT, USMC (ret)
    (looking for interesting info about 6.SS-Nord)

  3. Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,211

    Re: Something about <Band of Brothers>

    Nice call OT, time sensative mission and what if they were heard anyways and they swung their still loaded AA gun on them as they were moving out...... All in all probably dramitizing the causion and being clear thinking (regardless) in their first face to face after landing with the enemy. I have the book but don't remember if it is in there on the whys though.

    Cheers

    Tom

  4. Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,359

    Re: Something about <Band of Brothers>

    IMO the order to wait until the 20mm was reloading would be because the german Flakvierling loaders would be busy then and not just standing there and looking around.

    His order makes sense to me.



    Cheers,
    Dave
    There's no honorable way to kill, no gentle way to destroy. There is nothing good in war. Except its ending. - Anonymous.

  5. Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Age
    21
    Posts
    619

    Re: Something about <Band of Brothers>

    Dave got the answer right. If the gun was still firing and saw them they could be blown to bits. While loading the gunners are occupied with the task at hand and not paying attention to the noises around them. While firing they can be looking around at what is around them and do some listening. Dave is right.
    "We Will Stay Here, If We Must All Go to Hell Together"
    -Col. John R. Cooke, 27th NC, Hatcher's Run, 2 April 1865
    Avatar: My Grandfather on the right. His twin on the left. Their older brother in the middle. In their Navy Blues

  6. Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    "Ruhrpott"
    Posts
    27

    Re: Something about <Band of Brothers>

    Wasnt it practise to shoot 2 barrels while reloading the other 2?

  7. Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    4,211

    Re: Something about <Band of Brothers>

    Not sure but I would think firing all barrels at an air target for max damage would be priority. Now if it were ground targets getting closer, then maybe 2 barrels fire while the other two are being reloaded. Just to keep the oncoming and "getting closer" ground forces heads down.

    Cheers, have you heard this was pretty common Walser?

    Tom
    "Long is the way, rich and fruitfull the earth. On her fields death held its harvest." War in the East....
    SGT Rolf Werner, in those fields, fighting in Russia Sep, 1941. All to true in my humble opinion!!

  8. Re: Something about <Band of Brothers>


    This ad goes away if you register and log in.



    Either or:

    The gun was fired by a set of two footpedals—each of which fired two diametrically opposite Flak 38s—and could be operated either automatically or semi-automatically. When raised, the weapon measured 307 cm (10 feet 1 inch) high.

    Each of the four mounted guns fired from a 20-round magazine at a maximum combined rate of fire of 1,400 rounds per minute (reduced to 800 rounds per minute for combat use). The guns could be fired in pairs (diagonally opposite) or simultaneously, in either semi-automatic or fully automatic mode. Its effective vertical range was 2200 meters. It was also used just as effectively against ground targets as it was against low-flying aircraft.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Don Malarkey and Band of Brothers
    By RSS Bot in forum RSS Feeds
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: March 26th, 2009, 9:33 PM
  2. Who were the Bielski Brothers?
    By Stauffenberg719 in forum World War II Personalities
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 30th, 2008, 12:47 AM
  3. My uncles, the six Koski brothers
    By danoja in forum World War II Zone Roll of Honor
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: December 20th, 2008, 12:38 PM
  4. Band of Brothers
    By Phidippides in forum World War II on Screen
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: November 25th, 2008, 7:49 AM
  5. Band of Sisters
    By RSS Bot in forum RSS Feeds
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 6th, 2008, 1:10 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


If you enjoy this site and wish to help defray web hosting and software expenses, please consider becoming a

Site Supporter
Powered by nginx      Powered by FreeBSD      PHP Powered      Powered by MySQL