![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| South Asia and the Pacific, 1941-1945 From Pearl Harbor through Japan's early smashing successes to their eventual defeat in the air, at sea, and on the ground. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| Sponsored Links |
|
||||
|
Re: Battle of Guadalcanal
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Re: Battle of Guadalcanal
Haha, no, no, please don't concede. We're not in a debate, just in a friendly discussion
|
|
|||||
|
Re: Battle of Guadalcanal
If the Japanese had put their Val dive bombers on Guadalcanal ,they would have inflicted heavy losses on our convoys. They might have moved further southeast to the New Hebrides or Fiji blocking us completely from Australia.This is just speculation on my part,but do you think this was A possibillty?
|
|
||||
|
Re: Battle of Guadalcanal
Quote:
|
|
|||||
|
Re: Battle of Guadalcanal
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
http://short-urls.net - Free short URL Service http://domains.jlkhosting.com - Domain name registration http://domainhomeport.com - Free domain parking and shared commissions http://planetsearch.us - Planet Search http://superphotohost.us - Free image hosting |
|
||||
|
Re: Battle of Guadalcanal
Quote:
Port Moresby was indeed one of the important locations in the South Pacific. Had Battle of Coral not happen, or if the Kokoda invasion succeeded, Japan might have occupied it, therefore threatening Australia with aerial bombardment and naval blockade. And yes, possibly invasion, too. What I mean by the second post, though, is that Japan was already outstretched by the time they initially set foot on Guadalcanal. Even if they take Port Moresby, it does not change the strategic situation dramatically because they will only spread the Japanese ground strength. If the Japanese attempts an invasion on Australia, that would only further the dispersion of strength. In both what-if scenarios, the already overwhelmed supply line will become even more so. So, while I did seem to contradict myself earlier, does this make more sense now? Australia and other islands beyond the Solomon Islands were indeed threatened, but not "truly" threatened because Japan did not have ample logistical capabilities to keep them supplied. |
|
|||||
|
Re: Battle of Guadalcanal
The Japanese attempts to take Guadalcanal and New Guinea were in parallel with the strategy of isolating Australia to deny any Allied base for a build up. The ultimate aim was to to do just as many of the posts have stated. That is to block sealanes to and from Australia using naval and air power operating from bases in the areas occupied. It was calculated that a few divisions could then be used to take major Australian ports on the East coast of Australia, if even necessary. The taking of Rabaul was the first step in the whole procedure. The Battle of the Coral Sea stopped a direct landing at Port Moresby and so the Buna and Gona landings took place, with the subsequent Kokoda campaign following.
The first real defeat on land to the Japanese army came when they tried to invade at Milne Bay and were routed. The survivors were evacuated, the first time this had happened to the Japanese army in the war. |
|
||||
|
Re: Battle of Guadalcanal
Quote:
I guess my main point originally was that it was a TEAM effort that defeated the Jap(ane)s(e) |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Battle of the Bulge | RSS Bot | RSS Feeds | 0 | July 31st, 2006 09:56 PM |
| Battle of the Ruhr | RSS Bot | RSS Feeds | 0 | June 30th, 2006 09:58 PM |