![]() |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
| The Atomic Bomb The ultimate weapon of destruction, dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki |
| View Poll Results: Was the atomic bombing of Japan necessary to end the war? | |||
| Yes, the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs were necessary |
|
44 | 66.67% |
| The Hiroshima bomb was necessary, but the Nagasaki bomb was not |
|
7 | 10.61% |
| Neither bomb was necessary |
|
15 | 22.73% |
| Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|||||
|
Re: Was Dropping the Atomic Bomb Necessary for Ending the War with Japan?
Actually that little "factoid" has already been mentioned several times in this very thread.
__________________
http://short-urls.net - Free short URL Service http://domains.jlkhosting.com - Domain name registration http://domainhomeport.com - Free domain parking and shared commissions http://planetsearch.us - Planet Search http://superphotohost.us - Free image hosting |
| Sponsored Links |
|
||||
|
Re: Was Dropping the Atomic Bomb Necessary for Ending the War with Japan?
Yes.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The Showa's speech to the people was validation that he was not god. He was in fear for his life from Japanese that did not want to recognise the surrender. The recording of the Showa's declaration of surrender was safeguarded by Yoshihiro Tokugawa. Why would the voice of a god be under fire and need protection from a descendent of the longest line of Shoguns? Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Re: Was Dropping the Atomic Bomb Necessary for Ending the War with Japan?
Quote:
The word of the Emperor meant a lot to the Japanese people, and they are a people who throughout most of history were taught to appreciate, respect, and accept authority. But not even the least educated of bamboo farmers would have expected the Showa to throw lightling bolts from Fujiyama. Last edited by salinator; September 4th, 2008 at 03:53 AM. |
|
||||
|
Re: Was Dropping the Atomic Bomb Necessary for Ending the War with Japan?
Some points to consider:
#1) Purple decrypts from 1943 made available under the US Freedom of Information Act made it clear to Western Allies that japan had a project to develop an Atomic weapon. It was already known that uranium oxides were being shipped by U-boat and I class submarines from France in 1944. If you doubt this read Wikipedia about I-52. Point #2) Stalin promised at Potsdam to enter the war on 8th August 1945 and Stalin would surely capture the 8th Imperial Army's nuclear laboratory at Hungnam where Japan was preparing nuclear weapons. Point #3) Dr Yoshio Nishina who headed the Japanese A-bomb project visited Hiroshima the day following it's bombing. He confirmed to Japan's leadership that it had been caused by a nuclear weapon, but also told Japan's leaders not to surrender because USA could not possibly have enough nuclear material to build a second one [Nishina's post war memoirs] Nagasaki proved Nishina wrong. Point #4) On the same day Russia attacked Manchuria and Korea Japan successfully test blasted it's first A-bomb on an island near Hungnam. |
|
|||||
|
Re: Was Dropping the Atomic Bomb Necessary for Ending the War with Japan?
Quote:
Let's see the source documents to which you refer on other sites ["Proof of the August 1945 blast are on record with Army G-2 intelligence files of Major Furman (previously an ALSOS investigator in Europe) which are now held in the NARA archives at Suitland, Maryland. I can't recall the file box numbers, but I could look them up." is what you wrote at The Manhattan [Engineering] Project, page 1]. Look it up and produce the documents that prove this to be fact or call it what it is: supposition. (Oh, and BTW, Ethel's husband was Julius, not Marcus. They were guilty of passing secrets and deserved the punishment that they got; whether the information that they passed was "useful" or not, it was still classified and it was passed to an enemy of their nation. That's the law of our nation irrespective of your interpretation of it. I could mention that a friend of my father's grew up with them on the Lower East Side of Manhattan and she declared them guilty based on her own personal knowledge of certain facts, but that would be about as relevant as mentioning an alleged box or boxes at the NARA and not producing the documents.) Now I am not arguing that Japan was working on nuclear weapons. She was, and Japan was not the "innocent victim" of atomic warfare that political correctness and the passage of time has made her out to be. That is well known. How close they came is the question. The simple answer is not close enough. The Soviet archives probably hold more answers than anything in US possession.
__________________
http://short-urls.net - Free short URL Service http://domains.jlkhosting.com - Domain name registration http://domainhomeport.com - Free domain parking and shared commissions http://planetsearch.us - Planet Search http://superphotohost.us - Free image hosting |
|
||||
|
Re: Was Dropping the Atomic Bomb Necessary for Ending the War with Japan?
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Re: Was Dropping the Atomic Bomb Necessary for Ending the War with Japan?
David Snell was an investigator for the 24th Army Intelligence Corps. His source was a Japanese officer Capt. Wakabayashi of the 8th Imperial Army's Laboratory at Hungnam who was in charge of security at the facility.
http://www.reformation.org/atlanta-constitution.html Captain Wayabashi noted that the Japanese nuclear test was scheduled six days before it happened on 12 August 1945. Snell noted that Wayabashi was only a psudonym. He gave a physical description of the man which matched that of Prince Chichibu Yasuhito. Snell noted that the US Army required him to use the psudonym and not identify the man. Who in Japan at that time was a VIP of such significance that the US army required his name be kept secret ? Members of the Japanese Royal family were well known to masquerade as army officers with common names. For example Prince Takeda masqueraded as Colonel Miyata in Unit 731. Prince Takeda in fact was at Seoul in mid August 1945 and fought the Russians. This places the Japanese Royal family in close proximity to Konan (now Hungnam) at the time of the nuclear test. Several Royal princes were involved directly with the Mukden incident of 1931 and the Rape of Nanking in 1937. After the war the US Government directly participated in a cover up of the Japanese royal family's culpability in WW2 and continue to this day to classify evidence of the Japanese nuclear bomb project as part of that wider cover up. Prince Chichibu told Snell about the concealment of nuclear activities by the blowing up of mines. He was the only person in Japan in the business of blowing up mines or tunnels to conceal things. This was precisely what Prince Chichibu did in the Philippines concealing Yamashita's gold at 172 underground locations. After the war the Japanese Royal family worked with the US governent to recover stolen booty. Some of that gold was British from Singapore. Some of it was French hidden near saigon. Some of it was stolen from Buddhist temples in Thailand and Burma. Some was Dutch gold. The US government took no steps to repatriate the gold after the war but rather entered into an arrangement to exonerate war crimes by Japan in return for plundering Prince Chichibu's hidden gold. That is why you will never get anywhere near evidence of Japan's A-bomb. Because if you unravel the Japanese A-bomb story you also unravel concealment of war crimes by the US government. Author and radio operator on U-234 Wolfang Hirschfeld has made similar claims about a successful Japanese test blast. Last edited by Kiwiguy; September 15th, 2008 at 07:01 PM. |
|
||||
|
Re: Was Dropping the Atomic Bomb Necessary for Ending the War with Japan?
I also came across this quotation from a medical technician who had a chance discussion in Tokyo with an OSS officer about the Japanese A-bomb. Leon Thompson was a medical technician in Tokyo, Japan. He described a diagram of the Japanese atomic bomb and it was exactly like the U.S. bomb:
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why was Japan in China? | jdbeatty | Japanese Expansion before Pearl Harbor | 27 | September 30th, 2008 03:19 PM |
| Story of the Atomic Bomb | Jim O | The Atomic Bomb | 7 | July 14th, 2006 05:27 AM |