World War II Zone Forums

Go Back   World War II Zone Forums > Europe, Africa, and the Middle East > Versailles to September 1, 1939
Portal Register Members Awards Videos Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Chat Room

Notices

Versailles to September 1, 1939 World War II's roots can be traced back to the end of World War I. Discuss the events that lead up to the re-armament of Germany and the rise of fascism in Europe.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #81 (permalink)  
Old April 9th, 2008, 06:29 PM
TRDG's Avatar
Major



 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,588
Awards Showcase
United States 
Total Awards: 1
Post Re: Was blitzkrieg really that revolutionary?

1. Combined Arms

1-A. Air Support

Here is one of them, WW I introduced this new one, and had some success, but in WW II, the actual machines, weapons carried and the tech (radios anyone?) as well made this first group of the combined arms topic a "heavy hitter" and I think a key component. At least in the first and second year of the war. The dive bombers seemed to play a critical role here, more so than the fighters and some other types of bombers of the time.

Just a short intro for now, so feel free to comment on this 1-A. sub-topic for a while, it is not in order of rank or importance for me, but that is where I started. Intel, I think would be another (and the first concept rated as the first step in any list here) feature that may have applied here, and didn't some of this get done by the air? So I would ad this in, but will skip another "sub-topic" on this......

Cheers, Lets say 1-B. would be the armoured forces used for the second sub-section, when we get to that part!!

Tom
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #82 (permalink)  
Old May 20th, 2008, 07:04 PM
TRDG's Avatar
Major



 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,588
Awards Showcase
United States 
Total Awards: 1
Unhappy Re: Was blitzkrieg really that revolutionary?

WOW, no takers yet, I guess I will have to wait for fs to show up, or a little "helping hand" with a PM as well!! Ha Ha

Cheers

Tom
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)  
Old May 20th, 2008, 10:53 PM
MAGNA's Avatar
Moderator



 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Albany
Age: 48
Posts: 1,304
Awards Showcase
Australia 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Was blitzkrieg really that revolutionary?

I agree with the aircraft being a key component of Blitzkreig in WWII. The most noticeable attribute for me with aircraft was the shock value on a retreating or forming enemy. Confusion and sheer terror from constant attacks kept the enemy on the hop so to speak and did not allow time to react in mobile operations.

Dive bombers were also useful as forward artilllery since most ground artillery was not motorised and simply had trouble keeping up with armoured units.

The shock value to me is the most important as it was followed up by the further shock value of tanks, giving many units the impression that they were being assailed from every direction - the real key component of blitzkreig.

Reconnaissance by aircraft gave long range eyes to ground units and allowed them to head for areas of least resistance - again very important.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #84 (permalink)  
Old May 21st, 2008, 06:57 PM
TRDG's Avatar
Major



 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,588
Awards Showcase
United States 
Total Awards: 1
Thumbs up Re: Was blitzkrieg really that revolutionary?

Thanks for the reply Dave, IF you have total control of the air, recon and air strikes on retreating forces and fixed positions is the wat they went it seems. I'm not the best at the air war, but did'nt they Germans "drive" civs onto the road from towns as well to further choke the road routes the Allied forces had to use to retreat, OR go forward to try to stem the German Blitz tide as well?

Cheers, something maybe to add to the air component, did the Germans "plan" on this, or was it just happeneing to further benefit the German amy for the France battle?

TRDG

Tom
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #85 (permalink)  
Old May 22nd, 2008, 09:48 AM
MAGNA's Avatar
Moderator



 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Albany
Age: 48
Posts: 1,304
Awards Showcase
Australia 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Was blitzkrieg really that revolutionary?

Not sure on the civilian thing TRDG. It did happen though. I would also imagine the civilians mostly went of their own accord to avoid the fighting so it may have an automatic by product.

I know the planes were communicating via ground air controllers who were usually in half tracks with good comms systems. This was a vital component for picking targets and giving immediate feedback on results. It would have made the target units very edgy when each plane or wave seemed to be able to zero in so well.

It didn't always work well as Guderian found out in France. He was attacked by a couple of planes, one of which was shot down by German troops as it attacked. Guderian told the pilot off but also congratulated him on his tenacity - something like that.

The impact on rear area supplies and command posts must have had a huge effect on coordination of the defending forces too. Communications and transport would have been the other obvious targets.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old May 22nd, 2008, 10:55 PM
Freightshaker's Avatar
Staff Sergeant



 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Varies from day to day
Posts: 277
Re: Was blitzkrieg really that revolutionary?


But aircraft used in a recon or ground support role is still WW1 technology. Radio is still the big one. Without it, aircraft are flying willy-nilly around the battlefield, attacking uncordinated and at will.
__________________
If you bought it, we brought it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #87 (permalink)  
Old May 23rd, 2008, 12:37 AM
TRDG's Avatar
Major



 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,588
Awards Showcase
United States 
Total Awards: 1
Wink Re: Was blitzkrieg really that revolutionary?

You bet fs, but I think the actual way they were deployed, and what actual intel did they contrubute BEFORE the war in France got started might be an interesting side-track here!

Cheers

Tom
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #88 (permalink)  
Old July 16th, 2008, 09:42 AM
Private



 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: canada
Posts: 3
Re: Was blitzkrieg really that revolutionary?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freightshaker View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberia View Post

The deciding factor of Blitzkrieg's success, in my opinion, was the weaponry employed.

Opposing forces that crumbled in those onslaughts were not yelling out "Oh crap, they have radios". They were too busy fleeing Panzers, ducking Stukas and being overwhelmed by fast moving motorized infantry.

In other words, what made the operations so successful was the shock effect these weapons caused.

Large groups of opposing enemy forces, still capable of carrying on the fight, surrendered en mass because they felt they could not stand up to what was being thrown against them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAGNA View Post
That's the absolute crux of the whole concept. Even in the early war period when most german infantry was still on foot it worked. The shock factor came in due to the attacks from all directions. Aircraft from above coupled with armour from various directions - especially the rear - combined to give the impression there was no way out. For the man on the ground it would have looked like a hopeless situation.
Wireless allowed commanders to operate within the command cycle of their opponents. Whatever the enemy did, the Germans were one step ahead of them, which overwhelmed the enemy command.

Radio allowed commanders to direct vastly separated units and have them culminate on a single location. The tools for blitzkrieg where there 20 yrs previous, the ability to control them all was new.

I would greatly agree that radio played a key point in Germans advance early in the war. I does seem this effect was greatly negated later on with the code cracked on the enigma. Just a thought. It seems later on, everyone was one step ahead of the Germans, as they knew exactly what they were planning.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #89 (permalink)  
Old July 17th, 2008, 10:47 AM
MAGNA's Avatar
Moderator



 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Albany
Age: 48
Posts: 1,304
Awards Showcase
Australia 
Total Awards: 1
Re: Was blitzkrieg really that revolutionary?

As I posted in the WWI armour section for TRDG, Guderian spent the First World War in technical and comms work which exposed him to the possibilities of radio and fast transport (at that time trucks). When he was later exposed to the tank and other AFV's it all fell into place for him.

Kesselring also learned a lot in WWI about comms and observation since he was trained and first employed as an artillery officer. He saw the obvious advantages of first, observation balloons and then aircraft. His later work as a staff officer and then training service allowed him to help build the tactical Luftwaffe at the same time as Guderian headed the Armour Inspectorate and built the Panzerwaffe.

Thus, two new arms for Germany from the ground up with the experience behind them of two highly capable men. The Panzerwaffe and Luftwaffe as originally devised had not been seen before and were very hard to counter. They did however, have other parallels through history and were only new in the tactical sense.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #90 (permalink)  
Old July 18th, 2008, 11:21 AM
Freightshaker's Avatar
Staff Sergeant



 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Varies from day to day
Posts: 277
Re: Was blitzkrieg really that revolutionary?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coloursfly View Post
I would greatly agree that radio played a key point in Germans advance early in the war. I does seem this effect was greatly negated later on with the code cracked on the enigma. Just a thought. It seems later on, everyone was one step ahead of the Germans, as they knew exactly what they were planning.
Blitzkrieg is a short term doctrine that relies on speed and surprise. Once the surprise is gone, it's not very effective. It also has failings with fortifications and built up areas. Later in the war, surprise wasn't an option strategically (except for the Allied bungle in the Ardennes) and not very often operationally.
__________________
If you bought it, we brought it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Spearhead for Blitzkrieg RSS Bot RSS Feeds 0 March 7th, 2007 06:22 AM




If you enjoy this site and wish to help defray web hosting and software expenses, please consider becoming a

Site Supporter

World War II Topsites

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content ©2006-2008 World War II Zone. All rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.12816 seconds with 25 queries

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84